The U.S. Congress is getting older. Nearly 120 members are 70 or older, prompting questions about whether cognitive tests should be required for lawmakers. Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez introduced the idea earlier this year, proposing a neutral process to determine if any member suffers from serious cognitive issues. Although the amendment did not pass, many Americans remain uneasy about entrusting major decisions to officials who might face cognitive decline.
Cognitive decline often accompanies old age, but the proposed tests aimed to assess process, not age. Supporters argue that such exams could rebuild trust in Congress. Critics worry they could be politically manipulated or clash with constitutional rights.
Many insist voters, not medical exams, should decide who governs. Lawmakers counter that mandatory testing could infringe on privacy. Legally, implementing such a requirement is complicated. The Constitution sets the qualifications for Congress, and new laws cannot override them. A constitutional amendment would be needed—a challenging feat.
Currently, Congress can discipline or expel members for misconduct. However, expulsion requires a two-thirds vote, and incapacity alone rarely triggers action.